Door Stewards Registration Sub-committee - 09/12/2002
At a MEETING of the DOOR STEWARDS REGISTRATION SUB-COMMITTEE held at Dundee on 9th December 2002.
Present:-
COUNCILLORS
|
GEORGE REGAN |
DAVE BEATTIE |
BRUCE D MACKIE |
Councillor GEORGE REGAN, Chairman, in the Chair.
I LICENSING (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 - REGULAR EXTENSION - APPLICATIONS FOR DOOR STEWARDREGISTRATION (PROVISIONAL)
There were submitted the undernoted applications:
|
No |
Applicant
|
|
1 |
BC |
|
2 |
PC |
|
3 |
WD |
|
4 |
AF |
|
5 |
JG |
|
6 |
CH |
|
7 |
MH |
|
8 |
RL |
|
9 |
PMcG |
|
10 |
MMcL |
|
11 |
IMcR |
|
12 |
DM |
|
13 |
SP |
|
14 |
SS |
|
15 |
KS |
|
16 |
JT |
In the case of Application Nos 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 and 14 the Sub-Committee having been advised that the applicants were not present and agreed that the applications be dealt with in their absence.
After consideration of observations from the representative of Tayside Police, the Sub-Committee agreed that the applications be refused.
In the case of Application Nos 2 and 8 the Sub-Committee having been advised that the applicants were not present agreed to defer the applications.
In the case of Application No 6 the Sub-Committee having given consideration to a letter which had been submitted by the Chief Constable and having heard from the applicant on his own behalf agreed to grant the application.
In the case of Application No 9 the Sub-Committee having given consideration to a letter which had been submitted by Chief Constable and having heard from the applicant on his own behalf agreed to grant the application.
In the case of, Application No 11, the Sub-Committee gave consideration to a letter which had been submitted by the Chief Constable relative to this application. Part of the letter referred to convictions which were spent in terms of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act and after hearing the Chief Constable's representative as to their age and nature, the Sub-Committee agreed they be considered since justice could not otherwise be done.
Thereafter having heard the applicant on his own behalf the Sub-Committee agreed to refuse the application.
In the case of Application No 12 the Sub-Committee having given consideration to a letter which had been submitted by the Chief Constable and having heard from a representative on behalf of the applicant agreed to refuse the application.
In the case of Application No 13 the Sub-Committee having given consideration to a letter which had been submitted by the Chief Constable and having heard from the applicant on their own behalf agreed to grant the application.
In the case of Application No 15 the Sub-Committee having given consideration to a letter which had been submitted by the Chief Constable and having heard from the applicant on their own behalf agreed to grant the application.
In the case of Application No 16 the Sub-Committee gave consideration to a letter which had been submitted by the Chief Constable relative to this application. Part of the letter referred to convictions which were spent in terms of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act and after hearing the Chief Constable's representative as to their age and nature, the Sub-Committee agreed they be granted since justice could not otherwise be done.
Thereafter having heard from the applicant on their own behalf, the Sub-Committee agreed to grant the application.
GEORGE REGAN, Chairman.